The US healthcare bill explained
Today Barack Obama signs the US
healthcare reform bill into law. It's been a long, ugly and draining
process, but in the end Obama and the Democratic congress have succeeded
in doing what no US president before has been able to - reform the
broken American healthcare system.
I thought I'd write a brief entry on what this bill actually entails
because I've found a lot of Europeans (and Americans, for that matter)
are confused about what it contains. Many of my friends on the left seem
to be under the impression that the bill has been watered down so much
that it is almost meaningless and will do no good for anybody. People on
the right still seem to believe that this is a government takeover of
the healthcare system that mandates rationing of care. Neither is true.
What the bill does do is set up
strict new rules for how the private health insurance companies can
operate. Up to this point, private health insurance companies have had
special exemption from anti-competition laws and have been subject to
little regulation from the government, which has allowed costs to spiral
out of control. These changes will bring 32 million previously
uninsured Americans into the health coverage umbrella. As soon as Obama
puts his pen to paper today, the following things will happen at the
following times:Immediately
- Small businesses, who have had to pay drastically higher healthcare costs than large ones because they lack leverage when buying group plans for their employees, will be able to apply for tax credits.
- Seniors who have previously fallen into the so-called "donut hole" of skyrocketing costs for prescription medication will see their prices drop.
- Special pools will be set up for people with "preexisting conditions" so they can purchase healthcare that is not astronomically expensive.
- Insurance companies will no longer be able to deny children coverage because of a pre-existing condition.
- Insurance companies can no longer drop people when they get sick
- Insurance companies can no longer impose lifetime limits on people's benefits
- Young adults can stay on their parents' insurance until they're 26 (wish I had that back then!)
- Insurance companies will be required to spend 80-85% of what they are paid by people in actual medical care. If they don't, they must pay the difference as a rebate
- Medicare recipients will start getting free preventive care (not just emergency treatment)
- Insurance companies will no longer to be able to deny anyone coverage because of pre-existing conditions.
- Insurance companies can no longer impose annual limits on benefits
- All Americans will be required to have health insurance, which should achieve near-universal coverage
However there are limits to what this bill can accomplish, and by no means does it bring America to anywhere near the comprehensive level of European healthcare. It has backed away from any drastic changes and has kept the for-profit healthcare model intact. There are fears that without a public option adding competition, health insurance companies will have no reason to lower their rates. And now that all Americans will be mandated to have healthcare, the government is giving those insurance companies a whole new customer base. There is anxiety on the left that this bill merely forces everyone into a broken system, and that insurance companies will continue to drive up costs.
But the fact is this was perhaps
the best the Democratic congress could do in a fundamentally
conservative country where the right-wing dominates
the media messages. This has taken nearly a year to complete and it
has been very unpleasant to watch, showcasing not only the worst in the
American political system (the abused filibuster, the kickbacks, the
cynical grandstanding) but also in the American public (the hysteria,
the ignorance, the incivility). With the 2010 midterm elections coming
up in November, I think it's safe to say the Democratic congress doesn't
have much of an appetite to dive right into the other thorny issues
they promised to tackle, including the climate
change legislation. Obama has taken a beating in this healthcare
debate, and there's perhaps some wisdom in questioning why he chose to
pursue this issue before tackling climate change or financial
regulation. Over the coming weeks it will be interesting to see how
eager the white house and the congress are to move on to another fight. I
could be wrong, but I have a feeling there won't be much appetite for
that within congress.Incidentally, I have no idea how this health coverage requirement is going to affect Americans who live abroad in countries with national healthcare systems. We all have to file an income tax return every year, even if we don't owe anything. Apparently anyone without insurance will pay a penalty on their taxes. Does the NHS count as "insurance" for that purpose? Hopefully they haven't forgotten about us Benedict Arnolds when crafting this legislation!