Ireland and its Various Dark Ages
I’ve
just returned from a little weekend jaunt to Dublin, where I met my dad
and my brother who flew over from Switzerland. It was actually my first
time visiting Ireland, and it was great to finally visit a country that
I’ve long focused on, both recently with the drama of the Lisbon Treaty
ratification and in the past as a teenager when I looked to my Irish
roots for a sense of identity and pride – something quite common in the
US.
Ireland is a popular destination for American tourists, largely because so many Americans claim Irish heritage.
Despite the fact that I’ve travelled all over Europe, the first
question my relatives and friends back home always ask is if I’ve been
to Ireland. It seems to have taken on the aura of a ‘holy land’ for the
Irish diaspora, and for Americans the country has come to be more of a
concept than an actual geographic place. To be fair, many Americans use
their Irish ancestry to excuse bad behaviour like drunkenness or
fighting, but many also feel a deep connection with Celtic traditions
and the historical struggle of the Irish people.
I
myself was not immune to this wistful gazing toward the emerald isle.
I’m essentially only a quarter Irish (and Keating is an Anglo-Norman
Irish surname rather than a Celtic one), yet as a teenager I went
through a phase where I was fascinated by my Irish heritage, getting
really into Celtic new age music and Druidic history. I dreamed of one
day going to Dublin, the veritable Jerusalem of the Irish diaspora.So I finally made it there, though by this point in my life Ireland no longer holds the same fascination for me. In fact coming from London I definitely arrived in Dublin with different expectations than I would have had coming from the US years ago. They say that many American tourists, arriving in Dublin expecting to find a gleaming Shangri-la, are struck by the issues of poverty the city still grapples with today. However living in the UK for the past three years I guess I’ve come to view Dublin as more of a regional city on the periphery of the British Isles, like Manchester or Birmingham – gritty, tough and far from London.
Actually
Dublin reminded me of a smaller, grittier London. In fact it didn’t
really feel like I had left the UK, not least because there is no
passport check between the two countries. The Georgian and Victorian
buildings, the loutish drinking culture, the use of British English and
the endless array of British chain stores didn’t exactly seem foreign
to me. Nor did the weather, as it was overcast and rainy most of the
weekend!Birth of a Nation: A Slow Start
In
Dublin today you can really see the city existing between the three
very different periods of its history: the intimidating Georgian
splendour of its heyday as the second city of the British Empire, the
drab and repressive first decades of the Irish republic, and the boom
times of the IT and EU-fueled growth in the 1990’s.Of course I imagine there are plenty of Irish people who would take issue with the above characterisation of recent Irish history, but listening to tour guides and locals it was impossible to ignore this distinct split. Almost every major landmark in Dublin was built by the English: Christchurch and St. Patrick’s cathedrals, Dublin Castle, the Bank of Ireland, the Four Courts, Custom house, St. Stephen’s Green, the list goes on (of course, there was a cruel tyranny these impressive monuments reflected). The guides will also proudly point to the shiny glass skyscrapers and monuments built in the years since the boom of the 1990’s: the redevelopment of the docklands, the financial centre, the new tramway, etc.
Yet
as far as I could tell the only notable thing on the tourist map that
was built by the Irish between the years of 1921 and 1990 is that
ghastly spike in the middle of O’Connell street, which was put up after
the IRA blew up a British-built mock Nelson’s Column in the 1970's.
(I've just learned that the spike was put
up in 2003, so actually this wasn't built in the republic's first
decades either!).The more I read and talked to people, the more it seemed like now at the turn of the 21st century, those first decades of Irish Independence are starting to be seen as the proverbial ‘dark ages’. The country was hopelessly poor and saw its population fall throughout the period. Major literary figures, of whom the country has produced many, fled the country in reaction to the strict censorship laws imposed by the government, which was so closely aligned with the Catholic church it could almost have been considered a theocracy in all but name.
Incredibly,
divorce was illegal in Ireland until 1995, and even then it only passed
by a tiny margin. Homosexuality was a crime until 1993. Abortion is
still illegal in the country, abut in the 1990’s rules were loosened to
allow women to travel out of the country to get one.How things have changed in 20 years. After Ireland joined the EU, it benefited from a huge wave of investment from Brussels. The government shrewdly used this money to position Ireland away from its history as an agrarian economy and toward a knowledge-based economy, instituting one of the lowest corporate tax rates in the world to entice US companies to set up shop there. The strategy paid off. Today Ireland has one of the highest GDPs per capita in the world, and in contrast to the decades after independence, it now has the highest population growth rate in Europe.
The
evidence of this change can be seen in redeveloped pockets of Dublin,
where a new, cosmopolitan vibe has taken hold. The boom times may have
peaked off at the beginning of this decade, and Ireland may be
suffering comparatively worse during the global recession, but it seems
the attitude of the Irish, especially of Dubliners, has been
irrevocably changed. These new Euro-Dubliners travel around the
continent, sip cocktails in chic lounge bars by the river Liffey, and
work in beautiful new office buildings in the redeveloped docklands by
day. It doesn’t seem that anyone is in a big hurry to go back to the
old days of an isolationist government under the foot of the Catholic
Church (particularly after the church’s sex abuse revelations over the
past two decades).
Nowhere
is this more reflected than in a statistic I read in an Irish newspaper
that 83% of the country favours enacting civil unions for same-sex
partners (currently Italy and Ireland are the only two countries in
Western Europe that don’t have a gay partnership framework).Last week
the government published the civil unions law,
and the gay community in Ireland right now is in the midst of a heated
debate over whether to accept the proposed law (which stops far short
of giving same-sex couples the same rights as heterosexual couples) or
to refuse to accept anything but full marriage. It reminds me a bit of
the debate that raged in Ireland after the Anglo-Irish treaty
was drafted in 1920 offering Ireland conditional independence, with a
civil war eventually erupting between those Irish who supported the
treaty giving the lower counties autonomy under the British monarch, or
those who said the country should refuse to accept anything but full
independence for the entire island. I guess the age-old battle between
idealists and pragmatists never changes.EuroIreland
One
thing I was really surprised by was how many tourists from continental
Europe I saw in Dublin. I was expecting the vast majority of tourists
to be American, with Brits, Canadians and Australians making up the
rest. I figured without the mystique that Americans attach to it,
rainy, quiet Ireland might not be the top destination for continentals.
Yet throughout the weekend I was hearing Spanish, French Italian and
German all over the place. I was especially hearing a lot of French –
which I found really surprising. Even the bus tour we took of the
Wicklow mountains on Saturday – which I thought would surely be all
Americans – was mostly populated by continental Europeans. Colour me
surprised!Perhaps it just goes to show how much more European Ireland is these days. Despite the oft-used adage that “Dublin is closer to Boston than to Berlin” (geographically inaccurate but probably culturally true), there was plenty of evidence that Dublin, at least, is becoming Europeanised.
So where does this leave the Lisbon Treaty? Popular wisdom says that the Irish public will vote to approve the EU’s reform treaty, which it rejected last June, at the re-vote in October because the country’s financial situation has deteriorated so much since the first vote.
By
this line of reasoning the Irish seem to only wanted to engage with
Europe when it was going to give them money, and didn’t seem too keen
to give something back once Ireland was doing well and the new entrants
of Eastern Europe needed a helping hand. This is perhaps a rather
cynical explanation, but given the morass the EU helped pull the
country out of, it’s hard for me to understand the ‘no’ vote last year.
Despite all its progress, are there still isolationist urges embedded
in Ireland’s very DNA?It seems to me that all evidence points to the fact that Ireland works best when it works in cooperation with others, not when it tries to go it alone. One need only look at the agenda for any tour of Dublin to see that.
Comments
je suis daccord!! :)
c clair et net les amis!
la vie change chaque seconde ouiiiii:)
parfois faut faire attention
et pourquoi ne pas refaire ca une fois encore
faut surtout respecter ses idees
seulement ceux qui vivent ca peuvent savoir combien c difficile
lavenir est prometteur dans ce domaine :)
une idee parmis autres
c pas si difficile que ca non?!!