<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><?xml-stylesheet title="XSL formatting" type="text/xsl" href="http://gulfstreamblues.cafebabel.com/en/feed/rss2/xslt" ?><rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
  <title>Gulf Stream Blues  - Comments</title>
  <link>http://gulfstreamblues.cafebabel.com/en/</link>
  <description>European politics from an American perspective.</description>
  <language>en</language>
  <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:59:54 +01:00</pubDate>
  <copyright></copyright>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Dotclear</generator>
  
    
    
    <item>
    <title>Binge Drinking and the 21 Limit in the US - GulfStreamBlues</title>
    <link>http://gulfstreamblues.cafebabel.com/en/post/2008/08/19/Binge-Drinking-and-the-21-Limit-in-the-US#c96</link>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">urn:md5:abbc47e09ca5d1cacd953919d78a308a</guid>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 16:20:29 +01:00</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GulfStreamBlues</dc:creator>
    
    <description>&lt;p&gt;It's hard to see how the legality of underage drinking would affect whether the college was liable for a student suffering an alcohol-related fatality. The whole point is that the colleges are saying the law makes those incidents MORE likely anyway, so if they were worried about lawsuits they would be more likely to want the age limit lowered. Whether or not it was legal for the student to be drinking wouldn't have any effect on a parents' ability to school the school.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  </item>
      
</channel>
</rss>